![]() ![]() ![]() It has an easily understandable language to perform actions." "The most valuable feature is the onboarding of the workloads. So, there are zero concerns about managing the whole infrastructure on-premises." "It's easy to use. You can get down to a good level of detail regarding event information or notifications." "The data connectors that Microsoft Sentinel provides are easy to integrate when we work with a Microsoft agent." "Mainly, this is a cloud-native product. There are commitment tiers, up to six terabytes per day, which is nowhere close to what any one of our customers is running." "If you know how to do KQL (kusto query language) queries, which are how you query the log data inside Sentinel, the information is pretty rich. You can put unlimited logs in, as long as you can pay for it. So in Sentinel, it's very easy to find where the incident came from since we can easily get the information from the dashboard, after which we take action quickly." "The scalability is great. "Previously, it was a little bit difficult to find where an incident came from, including which IP address and which country. ![]() Devo SIEM falls short in terms of workflow integration and reporting. Users like Splunk's customization options and ability to quickly process data from multiple sources. Splunk is highly regarded for its efficient data processing and powerful search capabilities. While some users have observed a substantial ROI, others have not actively explored or been engaged in ROI conversations. Devo offers a substantial return on investment thanks to the solution’s superior data ingestion, scalability, and cost savings.Ĭomparison Results: Our users prefer Splunk Enterprise Security over Devo. ROI: Users said that it’s challenging to calculate an ROI for Splunk Enterprise Security, and the return varies depending on individual circumstances. However, reviewers recommend that Devo's pricing tiers should offer more flexibility. A few users expressed concerns about the cost of scaling up the solution and managing large volumes of data. Devo's pricing is considered fair and competitive with no hidden costs. Pricing: Some users consider Splunk Enterprise Security to be expensive, but others said the price is reasonable. Customers appreciate the ease of working with Devo and trust their support team.Įase of Deployment: Some users thought Splunk Enterprise Security was easy to deploy, while others found it challenging and needed assistance from Splunk engineers or third-party integrators. Devo's initial setup was deemed manageable, with users praising the ease of data onboarding as well as the availability of professional services and training. Service and Support: While some users found Splunk support to be responsive and helpful, others reported slow response times and a lack of expertise. Devo customers value their collaborative approach, responsiveness, and strong partnerships. Users say Devo’s agents could handle Windows event logs better, and the solution should overhaul its basic reporting mechanisms. ![]() Splunk users recommended improvements in AI capabilities, user-friendliness, and analytics. Devo could benefit from improved workflow integration and search features. They also liked Devo’s community-driven content and code-based approach. Users say Splunk is a highly scalable and customizable solution. Devo users praised the solution’s ability to ingest and store data in its original format and multi-tenancy feature. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.įeatures: Splunk Enterprise Security stands out for its efficiency, extensive integration options, and powerful search functionality. We performed a comparison between Splunk Enterprise Security and Devo based on our users’ reviews in five categories. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |